Difference between revisions of "76-08-A3"
Reagan admin (talk | contribs) m (1 revision imported) |
Reagan admin (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
<TABLE BORDER="0"><TR><TD WIDTH="60%" ROWSPAN="2"> | <TABLE BORDER="0"><TR><TD WIDTH="60%" ROWSPAN="2"> | ||
=== Transcript === | === Transcript === | ||
| − | + | Recently, the National Right to Work Committee presented evidence to the Federal Election Commission which it says shows that the AFL-CIO and its allegedly non-partisan Committee on Political Education (COPE) engaged in "massive violations" of the Federal Election Campaign Act during the 1976 campaign. | |
| + | |||
| + | In a complaint filed with the Commission, the Right to Work Committee said that the labor organizations illegally spent millions of dollars of union treasury funds on partisan registration and get-out-the-vote campaigns. | ||
| + | |||
| + | The Committee's complaint said, QUOTE -- "By various public accounts, the AFL-CIO and COPE spent in excess of 3 million dollars on voter registration campaigns, get-out-the-vote drives, and candidate-oriented communications aimed at their members." --UNQUOTE. For such expenditures to be legal, they must, under the law, be non-partisan. | ||
| + | |||
| + | The Right to Work Committee said in its complaint that the word "non-partisan" is more than superficial in its meaning. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Webster's Seventh New Collegiate Dictionary defines "non-partisan" as "free from party affiliation, bias, or designation". Thus, to determine whether a union's registration and get-out-the-vote activities should be exempt, ... it is important to determine whether they | ||
| + | were "non-partisan" or not. | ||
| + | |||
| + | The Right to Work Committee says, "Not only were the AFL-CIO's activities and those of COPE in this area not "non-partisan", and hence violative of ... (the law), but they were coordinated with the Carter presidential campaign and hence, by the law's standards, in-kind contributions rather than independent expenditures. Thus, such expenditures made by the AFL-CIO itself ... are clear violations of the law." | ||
| + | |||
| + | " ... If the law is to be applied equally and fairly the mere size and seriousness of these abuses mandate the Commission's priority attention. If this does not occur I know that ... millions of individuals ... will be left with one unmistakable conclusion: the very size and political power of this special interest group exempts it from the law." -- UNQUOTE. | ||
| + | |||
| + | The Right to Work Committee cited some examples of its allegation that the AFL-CIO and COPE were engaged in partisan election campaigning. They contended that Mary Zon, the COPE research director, was working three days a week on the Carter campaign payroll as a liaison between the campaign and organized labor. And that Alexander Barkan, national director of COPE, served simultaneously on the Democratic National Committee's 42-member campaign steering committee. | ||
| + | |||
| + | The Right to Work Committee also charged that between March 1975 and June 1976, some $600,000 was transferred from the AFL-CIO's general treasury to the COPE education fund. During this same period of time, some $385,000 was diverted from the education fund to COPE's political contributions committee. | ||
| + | |||
| + | With all the recent sound-and-fury over election reform, the Federal Election Commission has a responsibility to investigate this complaint. | ||
| + | |||
| + | This is Ronald Reagan. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Thanks for listening. | ||
</TD> | </TD> | ||
| Line 17: | Line 40: | ||
<TR><TD WIDTH="150">Batch Number</TD><TD WIDTH="150">{{PAGENAME}}</TD></TR> | <TR><TD WIDTH="150">Batch Number</TD><TD WIDTH="150">{{PAGENAME}}</TD></TR> | ||
<TD>Production Date</TD><TD>01/19/[[Radio1977|1977]]</TD></TR> | <TD>Production Date</TD><TD>01/19/[[Radio1977|1977]]</TD></TR> | ||
| − | <TD>Book/Page</TD><TD> | + | <TD>Book/Page</TD><TD>[https://www.reaganlibrary.gov/public/2024-07/40-656-7386263-014-003-2024.pdf#page=5 Online PDF]</TD></TR> |
<TD>Audio</TD><TD></TD></TR> | <TD>Audio</TD><TD></TD></TR> | ||
<TD>Youtube?</TD><TD>No</TD></TR> | <TD>Youtube?</TD><TD>No</TD></TR> | ||
| Line 24: | Line 47: | ||
<TR><TD VALIGN="TOP"> | <TR><TD VALIGN="TOP"> | ||
===Added Notes=== | ===Added Notes=== | ||
| − | + | * [https://www.fec.gov/resources/record/1977/july_1977_record.pdf FEC July 1977 Record], with details of the allegations. | |
| + | * [https://www.fec.gov/resources/record/1978/august_1978_record.pdf FEC August 1978 Record], showing a $10,000 civil penalty against the AFL-CIO for the violations. | ||
</TD></TR> | </TD></TR> | ||
</TABLE> | </TABLE> | ||
Latest revision as of 14:11, 11 December 2025
- Main Page \ Reagan Radio Commentaries \ 1977
| << Previous Broadcast | Next Broadcast >> |
Campaign Law Violated?[edit]
Transcript[edit]Recently, the National Right to Work Committee presented evidence to the Federal Election Commission which it says shows that the AFL-CIO and its allegedly non-partisan Committee on Political Education (COPE) engaged in "massive violations" of the Federal Election Campaign Act during the 1976 campaign. In a complaint filed with the Commission, the Right to Work Committee said that the labor organizations illegally spent millions of dollars of union treasury funds on partisan registration and get-out-the-vote campaigns. The Committee's complaint said, QUOTE -- "By various public accounts, the AFL-CIO and COPE spent in excess of 3 million dollars on voter registration campaigns, get-out-the-vote drives, and candidate-oriented communications aimed at their members." --UNQUOTE. For such expenditures to be legal, they must, under the law, be non-partisan. The Right to Work Committee said in its complaint that the word "non-partisan" is more than superficial in its meaning. Webster's Seventh New Collegiate Dictionary defines "non-partisan" as "free from party affiliation, bias, or designation". Thus, to determine whether a union's registration and get-out-the-vote activities should be exempt, ... it is important to determine whether they were "non-partisan" or not. The Right to Work Committee says, "Not only were the AFL-CIO's activities and those of COPE in this area not "non-partisan", and hence violative of ... (the law), but they were coordinated with the Carter presidential campaign and hence, by the law's standards, in-kind contributions rather than independent expenditures. Thus, such expenditures made by the AFL-CIO itself ... are clear violations of the law." " ... If the law is to be applied equally and fairly the mere size and seriousness of these abuses mandate the Commission's priority attention. If this does not occur I know that ... millions of individuals ... will be left with one unmistakable conclusion: the very size and political power of this special interest group exempts it from the law." -- UNQUOTE. The Right to Work Committee cited some examples of its allegation that the AFL-CIO and COPE were engaged in partisan election campaigning. They contended that Mary Zon, the COPE research director, was working three days a week on the Carter campaign payroll as a liaison between the campaign and organized labor. And that Alexander Barkan, national director of COPE, served simultaneously on the Democratic National Committee's 42-member campaign steering committee. The Right to Work Committee also charged that between March 1975 and June 1976, some $600,000 was transferred from the AFL-CIO's general treasury to the COPE education fund. During this same period of time, some $385,000 was diverted from the education fund to COPE's political contributions committee. With all the recent sound-and-fury over election reform, the Federal Election Commission has a responsibility to investigate this complaint. This is Ronald Reagan. Thanks for listening. |
Details[edit]
| |||||||||||
Added Notes[edit]
|