Difference between revisions of "76-08-A3"

en>Reagan admin
(Importing new page for 76-08-A3)
 
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 8: Line 8:
 
<TABLE BORDER="0"><TR><TD WIDTH="60%" ROWSPAN="2">
 
<TABLE BORDER="0"><TR><TD WIDTH="60%" ROWSPAN="2">
 
=== Transcript ===
 
=== Transcript ===
No Transcript Currently Available
+
Recently, the National Right to Work Committee presented evidence to the Federal Election Commission which it says shows that the AFL-CIO and its allegedly non-partisan Committee on Political Education (COPE) engaged in "massive violations" of the Federal Election Campaign Act during the 1976 campaign.
 +
 
 +
In a complaint filed with the Commission, the Right to Work Committee said that the labor organizations illegally spent millions of dollars of union treasury funds on partisan registration and get-out-the-vote campaigns.
 +
 
 +
The Committee's complaint said, QUOTE -- "By various public accounts, the AFL-CIO and COPE spent in excess of 3 million dollars on voter registration campaigns, get-out-the-vote drives, and candidate-oriented communications aimed at their members." --UNQUOTE. For such expenditures to be legal, they must, under the law, be non-partisan.
 +
 
 +
The Right to Work Committee said in its complaint that the word "non-partisan" is more than superficial in its meaning.
 +
 
 +
Webster's Seventh New Collegiate Dictionary defines "non-partisan" as "free from party affiliation, bias, or designation". Thus, to determine whether a union's registration and get-out-the-vote activities should be exempt, ... it is important to determine whether they
 +
were "non-partisan" or not.
 +
 
 +
The Right to Work Committee says, "Not only were the AFL-CIO's activities and those of COPE in this area not "non-partisan", and hence violative of ... (the law), but they were coordinated with the Carter presidential campaign and hence, by the law's standards, in-kind contributions rather than independent expenditures. Thus, such expenditures made by the AFL-CIO itself ... are clear violations of the law."
 +
 
 +
" ... If the law is to be applied equally and fairly the mere size and seriousness of these abuses mandate the Commission's priority attention. If this does not occur I know that ... millions of individuals ... will be left with one unmistakable conclusion: the very size and political power of this special interest group exempts it from the law." -- UNQUOTE.
 +
 
 +
The Right to Work Committee cited some examples of its allegation that the AFL-CIO and COPE were engaged in partisan election campaigning. They contended that Mary Zon, the COPE research director, was working three days a week on the Carter campaign payroll as a liaison between the campaign and organized labor. And that Alexander Barkan, national director of COPE, served simultaneously on the Democratic National Committee's 42-member campaign steering committee.
 +
 
 +
The Right to Work Committee also charged that between March 1975 and June 1976, some $600,000 was transferred from the AFL-CIO's general treasury to the COPE education fund. During this same period of time, some $385,000 was diverted from the education fund to COPE's political contributions committee.
 +
 
 +
With all the recent sound-and-fury over election reform, the Federal Election Commission has a responsibility to investigate this complaint.
 +
 
 +
This is Ronald Reagan.
 +
 
 +
Thanks for listening.
  
 
</TD>
 
</TD>
Line 17: Line 40:
 
<TR><TD WIDTH="150">Batch Number</TD><TD WIDTH="150">{{PAGENAME}}</TD></TR>
 
<TR><TD WIDTH="150">Batch Number</TD><TD WIDTH="150">{{PAGENAME}}</TD></TR>
 
<TD>Production Date</TD><TD>01/19/[[Radio1977|1977]]</TD></TR>
 
<TD>Production Date</TD><TD>01/19/[[Radio1977|1977]]</TD></TR>
<TD>Book/Page</TD><TD>N/A</TD></TR>
+
<TD>Book/Page</TD><TD>[https://www.reaganlibrary.gov/public/2024-07/40-656-7386263-014-003-2024.pdf#page=5 Online PDF]</TD></TR>
 
<TD>Audio</TD><TD></TD></TR>
 
<TD>Audio</TD><TD></TD></TR>
 
<TD>Youtube?</TD><TD>No</TD></TR>
 
<TD>Youtube?</TD><TD>No</TD></TR>
Line 24: Line 47:
 
<TR><TD VALIGN="TOP">
 
<TR><TD VALIGN="TOP">
 
===Added Notes===
 
===Added Notes===
 
+
* [https://www.fec.gov/resources/record/1977/july_1977_record.pdf FEC July 1977 Record], with details of the allegations.
 +
* [https://www.fec.gov/resources/record/1978/august_1978_record.pdf FEC August 1978 Record], showing a $10,000 civil penalty against the AFL-CIO for the violations.
 
</TD></TR>
 
</TD></TR>
 
</TABLE>
 
</TABLE>

Latest revision as of 14:11, 11 December 2025

- Main Page \ Reagan Radio Commentaries \ 1977

<< Previous BroadcastNext Broadcast >>

Campaign Law Violated?[edit]

Transcript[edit]

Recently, the National Right to Work Committee presented evidence to the Federal Election Commission which it says shows that the AFL-CIO and its allegedly non-partisan Committee on Political Education (COPE) engaged in "massive violations" of the Federal Election Campaign Act during the 1976 campaign.

In a complaint filed with the Commission, the Right to Work Committee said that the labor organizations illegally spent millions of dollars of union treasury funds on partisan registration and get-out-the-vote campaigns.

The Committee's complaint said, QUOTE -- "By various public accounts, the AFL-CIO and COPE spent in excess of 3 million dollars on voter registration campaigns, get-out-the-vote drives, and candidate-oriented communications aimed at their members." --UNQUOTE. For such expenditures to be legal, they must, under the law, be non-partisan.

The Right to Work Committee said in its complaint that the word "non-partisan" is more than superficial in its meaning.

Webster's Seventh New Collegiate Dictionary defines "non-partisan" as "free from party affiliation, bias, or designation". Thus, to determine whether a union's registration and get-out-the-vote activities should be exempt, ... it is important to determine whether they were "non-partisan" or not.

The Right to Work Committee says, "Not only were the AFL-CIO's activities and those of COPE in this area not "non-partisan", and hence violative of ... (the law), but they were coordinated with the Carter presidential campaign and hence, by the law's standards, in-kind contributions rather than independent expenditures. Thus, such expenditures made by the AFL-CIO itself ... are clear violations of the law."

" ... If the law is to be applied equally and fairly the mere size and seriousness of these abuses mandate the Commission's priority attention. If this does not occur I know that ... millions of individuals ... will be left with one unmistakable conclusion: the very size and political power of this special interest group exempts it from the law." -- UNQUOTE.

The Right to Work Committee cited some examples of its allegation that the AFL-CIO and COPE were engaged in partisan election campaigning. They contended that Mary Zon, the COPE research director, was working three days a week on the Carter campaign payroll as a liaison between the campaign and organized labor. And that Alexander Barkan, national director of COPE, served simultaneously on the Democratic National Committee's 42-member campaign steering committee.

The Right to Work Committee also charged that between March 1975 and June 1976, some $600,000 was transferred from the AFL-CIO's general treasury to the COPE education fund. During this same period of time, some $385,000 was diverted from the education fund to COPE's political contributions committee.

With all the recent sound-and-fury over election reform, the Federal Election Commission has a responsibility to investigate this complaint.

This is Ronald Reagan.

Thanks for listening.

 

Details[edit]

Batch Number76-08-A3
Production Date01/19/1977
Book/PageOnline PDF
Audio
Youtube?No

Added Notes[edit]