Difference between revisions of "78-06-A6"

m (1 revision imported)
 
Line 8: Line 8:
 
<TABLE BORDER="0"><TR><TD WIDTH="60%" ROWSPAN="2">
 
<TABLE BORDER="0"><TR><TD WIDTH="60%" ROWSPAN="2">
 
=== Transcript ===
 
=== Transcript ===
No Transcript Currently Available
+
It was just before mid-February that a Senate Subcommittee heard testimony
 +
by two representatives of the Civil Service commission. Alan Campbell, chairman
 +
of the commission, and Robert J. Drummond Jr., director of Personnel Investigations,
 +
told the committee what some had suspected was indeed true; known members of
 +
terrorist organizations and even Communist party members can not only become civil
 +
servants in government but can rise to the most sensitive of government positions.
 +
Their subversive connections and associations are deliberately left out of the
 +
Commissions files.
  
 +
Mr. Campbell said that membership in any kind of organization is protected by
 +
the Privacy Act. The Civil Service Commission does about 25,000 full field
 +
investigations every year and, he added, it is increasingly difficult to obtain
 +
pertinent information about potential government employees. You see, investigators
 +
are instructed to inform each source of information that the information and the
 +
identity of the informant will be given to the person being investigated upon
 +
request. This does not exactly inspire an informant to tell all.
 +
 +
It seems ridiculous, but it is even difficult to get reports of criminal
 +
records of prospective employees. Local law enforcement agencies balk at
 +
revealing conviction and arrest records. This is true of large states such as
 +
California , New York and Illinois and at least 90 cities in other states. In their
 +
words, there is a near collapse of the Federal government's personnel security
 +
program.
 +
 +
It boggles the mind when you consider that this lack of ability to investigate
 +
involves prospective employees in the Pentagon, Foreign service officers and many
 +
who are being hired for other sensitive positions.
 +
 +
The Senate committee well remembers the "cold war" days in the decade
 +
following World War II when communists in a great many critical agencies created
 +
a massive subversion problem in our government.
 +
 +
Senator Strom Thurmond asked Mr. Campbell: --QUOTE--"You have to have some
 +
kind of criteria that enables you to make determinations as to what kind of activity
 +
constitutes proper cause for believing the applicant in question may not be
 +
loyal to the United States. Would you agree to that?" --UNQUOTE--. Campbell
 +
replied there should be such criteria but when he was asked, "Do you have such
 +
criteria today?" He answered "No sir, we do not". Then he was asked if it weren't
 +
true that the commission itself had ruled that applicants for Federal employment
 +
could not be asked whether they were committed to the violent overthrow of our
 +
government or whether their sympathies lay with another government. The answer
 +
was that legal counsel had advised the commission such questions would violate
 +
the Privacy Act.
 +
 +
Senators pressed for answers on specific terrorist groups and whether
 +
membership in them would bar an individual from government service. The answer
 +
was always no, in addition to which the Director admitted the Commission intended
 +
to destroy its files on 2200 questionable organizations.
 +
 +
It makes you wonder if the inmates aren't running the asylum.
 +
 +
This is Ronald Reagan.
 +
 +
Thanks for listening.
 
</TD>
 
</TD>
 
<TD WIDTH="10%" ROWSPAN="2">&nbsp;</TD>
 
<TD WIDTH="10%" ROWSPAN="2">&nbsp;</TD>

Latest revision as of 15:00, 26 January 2026

- Main Page \ Reagan Radio Commentaries \ 1978

<< Previous BroadcastNext Broadcast >>

Government Security[edit]

Transcript[edit]

It was just before mid-February that a Senate Subcommittee heard testimony by two representatives of the Civil Service commission. Alan Campbell, chairman of the commission, and Robert J. Drummond Jr., director of Personnel Investigations, told the committee what some had suspected was indeed true; known members of terrorist organizations and even Communist party members can not only become civil servants in government but can rise to the most sensitive of government positions. Their subversive connections and associations are deliberately left out of the Commissions files.

Mr. Campbell said that membership in any kind of organization is protected by the Privacy Act. The Civil Service Commission does about 25,000 full field investigations every year and, he added, it is increasingly difficult to obtain pertinent information about potential government employees. You see, investigators are instructed to inform each source of information that the information and the identity of the informant will be given to the person being investigated upon request. This does not exactly inspire an informant to tell all.

It seems ridiculous, but it is even difficult to get reports of criminal records of prospective employees. Local law enforcement agencies balk at revealing conviction and arrest records. This is true of large states such as California , New York and Illinois and at least 90 cities in other states. In their words, there is a near collapse of the Federal government's personnel security program.

It boggles the mind when you consider that this lack of ability to investigate involves prospective employees in the Pentagon, Foreign service officers and many who are being hired for other sensitive positions.

The Senate committee well remembers the "cold war" days in the decade following World War II when communists in a great many critical agencies created a massive subversion problem in our government.

Senator Strom Thurmond asked Mr. Campbell: --QUOTE--"You have to have some kind of criteria that enables you to make determinations as to what kind of activity constitutes proper cause for believing the applicant in question may not be loyal to the United States. Would you agree to that?" --UNQUOTE--. Campbell replied there should be such criteria but when he was asked, "Do you have such criteria today?" He answered "No sir, we do not". Then he was asked if it weren't true that the commission itself had ruled that applicants for Federal employment could not be asked whether they were committed to the violent overthrow of our government or whether their sympathies lay with another government. The answer was that legal counsel had advised the commission such questions would violate the Privacy Act.

Senators pressed for answers on specific terrorist groups and whether membership in them would bar an individual from government service. The answer was always no, in addition to which the Director admitted the Commission intended to destroy its files on 2200 questionable organizations.

It makes you wonder if the inmates aren't running the asylum.

This is Ronald Reagan.

Thanks for listening.

 

Details[edit]

Batch Number78-06-A6
Production Date03/13/1978
Book/PageRPtV-291
Audio
Youtube?No

Added Notes[edit]