79-11-A6
- Main Page \ Reagan Radio Commentaries \ 1979
| << Previous Broadcast | Next Broadcast >> |
Another Side of the U.N.[edit]
Transcript[edit]On these broadcasts I haven't been bashful about criticizing the United Nations, especially the General Assembly, which has shown on plenty occasions that it doesn't care much for free speech and that it can be long on hypocrisy and short on good sense. Just the same, for those of us who are skeptical about the U.N. 's performance, we can take a little comfort from the fact that some of its lesser known programs may not be such a bad investment, after all. One expert on the technical aspects of the U.N., Francis Dale, now the publisher of the Los Angeles HERALD-EXAMINER, but formerly our ambassador to the Geneva half of the U.N., has given me some interesting facts. Frank Dale points out that Geneva is the nerve center for the technical agencies of the United Nations, while New York is the center of debate. Mr. Dale says that the truth about the U.N. lies somewhere between the notion that it is mankind's greatest hope for democratic principles and the idea that it is a total waste of time and money. Ambassador Dale contends that, on balance, we are really getting a pretty good return on our overall investment in the U.N. Here's how he figures it: First, he says, we have to see the U.N. as more than the General Assembly and Security Council. It is actually a system of 14 special agencies, including the World Health organization, the U.N. Educational, Scientific and Cultural organization, and so forth. In addition, there is a group of 19 funds and programs which are part of the U.N. system. Most widely known of them is UNICEF. Mr. Dale estimates that our total contribution to all of these entities amounts to about $2.37 per year for each American. As for what we get for our money, he says, take a look at the World Health organization. Twelve years ago it initiated a campaign to remove smallpox from the face of the earth. Our contribution to this campaign amounted to about $25 billion. But, as a result of its success, the Surgeon General in 1972 was able to terminate our routine smallpox vaccination program here in the United States, at an approximate annual savings of $140 million. According to Ambassador Dale, other U.N. agencies such as the World Bank and the U.N. Development program are also money-makers for the United States. Still other activities are worth the costs, he says, not only in financial terms but in less tangible ways, too. He points out that, despite its reputation for crazy resolutions and rhetoric, the debating society side of the U.N. in New York generates plenty of revenue for Americans. The U.N. diplomatic corps is estimated to spend some $180 million a year on our shores. That's only a sampling of some of the "plusses" that former U.N. Ambassador Frank Dale cites when he says we should look behind the façade of the U.N. to see that we are getting something--even if it isn't enough--for our investment. This is Ronald Reagan. Thanks for listening. |
Details[edit]
| |||||||||||
Added Notes[edit] |
